I'm with it. This will enable more seamless on-flows from Moonbeam where most of the EVM action seems to be within the eco.
Absolutely agree! All liquidity should be utilized in the most effecient and safest way as possible. Due to past incidents both with Acala and Wormhole, I would prefer HydraDX collaborate with the Moonbeam ecosystem, as one of the most active and legit ecosystems.
I like this plan. It seems that there will still be enough liquidity for these assets even after the proposed removal, so it seems like a smooth plan.
Plus, Moonbeam route has been awaited for quite some time!.
The more integrations with moonbeam the better. But as i understand we will have two versions of bridged assets (acala and moonbeam) which is quite puzzling for UX.
"increasingly efficient arbs and additional onboarding routes for our users", diversification -- I vote aye
I vote aye! it's time to open the doors to moar routes. I'm excited, especially for the evm support coming up!
this is an aye for me, Moonbeam has proven to be a reliable team and we can take advantage of the liquidity that is handled in its chain with the ease of its tools