Darwinia RING Omnipool Listing Proposal

  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up 4
Share
Comments

Very good idea, I think it will be a very good development to add RING to HydraDX. It is the first decentralized DEX where RING will be 😁🙌

Edited

Reply
Up 1

Darwinia has been building non stop for years now and with the message protocol thats being build within Darwinia, it'll be a game changer for many other chains that are connected with us. One $ring to connect them all!

Reply
Up 1

$ring has the potential to be a crucial link with the upcoming message protocol being developed within Darwinia. Expanding around $ring ecosystem is bullish asf!

Reply
Up 1

I support adding $RING to the Omnipool. No sudo, OpenGov has been adopted, price discovery has already occurred and it appears 74% of RING is already in circulation. When I first looked at token distribution I was concerned that 95% of tokens are controlled by whale accounts. However, after JDubs explained which ones are protocol/foundation accounts, the top accounts under individual control (6, 8, 9, 11, 12) account for 169.5M RING or 7% of supply which is sufficiently low.

However, I would encourage the Darwinia community to quickly follow up with adding more RING liquidity beyond the initial $130k. Many parachains are in discussion to add $1M and Darwinia recently had a discussion about burning 400M RING which could instead be used to build ecosystem liquidity. I'd recommend earmarking 200M RING for Hydra liquidity and 40M RING to deposit into
a future lending market on Hydra. (I would suggest POL into other protocols as well, but Bifrost is only rolling out lending for their vTokens and Interlay has a technical limitation that they can't open lending markets for tokens with 18 decimals)

Edited

Reply
Up 3

I support this

Reply
Up